Moopuna
Site Search:    

Term Papers Categories

Acceptance Essays
Alcohol & Drugs
American History
Anatomy & Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Biographies
Biology
Book Reports
Business
Chemistry
Computers & Internet
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental Issues
Ethics
European History
Film & Cinema
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Health & Beauty
Health Care
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Movies
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Issues
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech & Communications
Sports & Games
Supernatural Issues
Technology
Theater
World History
Zoology




Assumption Of Risk: Who Is To Blame For Our Actions

Statistics

  Counts

  Total Pages: 7.73
  Total Words: 1933
  Total Characters: 10687
  Number of Sentences: 89


  Averages

  Words per Sentences: 21.72
  Characters per Words: 5.53


  Readability

  Flesch Reading Ease: 45.09
  Fog Scale Level: 15.95
  Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 12.37  

Assumption of Risk: Who is to Blame For Our Actions


     The doctrine of "assumption of risk" clearly defines the responsibility
of all voluntary actions taken on by individuals, independent of the inherent
risk or danger involved with such actions.  Are we only to assume responsibility
for the positive outcomes of our actions, without also accepting the negative
outcomes as well?  Most individuals only claim responsibility in cases in which
they are fully responsible for their actions.  Living within a country which
houses a large amount of private enterprise, we often find ourselves relying on
outside help.  In many occasions we, the individual seeking assistance, hold the
power to choose which avenue of help will be taken.  In these cases in which we
have the choice, should we not also be held responsible for the outcomes of our
decisions, especially in cases in which we have been pre-warned about any
inherent risks or dangers?  For example, When we take it upon ourselves to drive
on a private road, smoke cigarettes, work for a mining company, or fly on a
discount airline at our own volition, do we tacitly consent to take
responsibility for any outcome these actions may hold?  The "assumption of risk"
doctrine seems to ignore the fundamental obligation of entities to ensure their
natural goals.  The distinguishing factor in deciding responsibility in
faultless cases which call on the "assumption of risk" doctrine is the control
held by individuals after the situation has begun.  In accordance, companies
such as discount airlines and cigarette companies must take on the
responsibility of completing their duties, while individuals who chose to work
in a mine or drive on a private road must accept the responsibility of their
actions to do so.
     All airlines hold the responsibility of transporting their customers
from a point of origin to a previously designated destination.  The person who
agrees to buy a discount airline ticket, which warns...

Please login to view comments from other users.



If you are having problems registering, please don't hesitate to contact us.

© Copyright 1999-2007 Moopuna.com. All Rights Reserved.