	Save up to 50% if you register now!


Moopuna: Home - About Moopuna - Search - Help	Login - Register Now



	Site Search:

Term Papers Categories

Acceptance Essays
Alcohol & Drugs
American History
Anatomy & Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Biographies
Biology
Book Reports
Business
Chemistry
Computers & Internet
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental Issues
Ethics
European History
Film & Cinema
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Health & Beauty
Health Care
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Movies
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Issues
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech & Communications
Sports & Games
Supernatural Issues
Technology
Theater
World History
Zoology

Functionalism According To Fodor And Searle

Statistics

Counts

Total Pages: 5.45
Total Words: 1362
Total Characters: 6846
Number of Sentences: 77

Averages

Words per Sentences: 17.69
Characters per Words: 5.03

Readability

Flesch Reading Ease: 59.25
Fog Scale Level: 11.69
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 9.39

Functionalism According to Fodor and Searle

Measuring the IQ of Mind and Machine:
an Examination of Functionalism as Represented by Fodor and Searle
~ Shanaree Sailor ~

Fodor begins his article on the mind-body problem with a review of the current theories of dualism and materialism. According to dualism, the mind and body are two separate entities with the body being physical and the mind being nonphysical. If this is the case, though, then there can be no interaction between the two. The mind could not influence anything physical without violating the laws of physics. The materialist theory, on the other hand, states that the mind is not distinct from the physical. In fact, supporters of the materialist theory believe that behavior does not have mental causes. When the materialist theory is split into logical behaviorism and the central-state identity theory, the foundation of functionalism begins to form. Logical behaviorism states that every mental feeling has the same meaning as an if-then statement. For example, instead of saying "Dr. Lux is hungry," one would say "If there was a quart of macadamia brittle nut in the freezer, Dr. Lux would eat it." The central-state identity theory states that a certain mental state equals a certain neurophysiological state. The theory works in a way similar to Berkeley’s representation of objects. Both mental states and objects are a certain collection of perceptions that together identify the particular state or object.
Fodor develops the idea of functionalism by combining certain parts of logical behaviorism and the central-state identity theory. From logical behaviorism, Fodor incorporates the idea that mental processes can be represented by physical if-then statements. As such, behavior and mental causation are no longer distinct and unable to interact. Also, logical behaviorism provides a way for mental causes to interact with other mental causes. This, in turn, may result in a behavioral effect....

Please login to view comments from other users.

Subscription Plans Price Savings

1 Month (automatic renewal) $29.95

3 Month (automatic renewal) $59.95 32 %

6 Month (one-time billing) $89.95 50 %

Pay with:

If you are having problems registering, please don't hesitate to contact us.