Moopuna
Site Search:    

Term Papers Categories

Acceptance Essays
Alcohol & Drugs
American History
Anatomy & Physiology
Animal Science
Anthropology
Architecture
Arts
Astronomy
Aviation
Biographies
Biology
Book Reports
Business
Chemistry
Computers & Internet
Creative Writing
Current Events
Economics
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental Issues
Ethics
European History
Film & Cinema
Foreign Languages
Geography
Government
Health & Beauty
Health Care
History
Human Sexuality
Legal Issues
Marketing
Mathematics
Medicine
Movies
Music
Mythology
Philosophy
Physics
Poetry
Political Issues
Political Science
Psychology
Religion
Science
Shakespeare
Social Issues
Sociology
Speech & Communications
Sports & Games
Supernatural Issues
Technology
Theater
World History
Zoology




DISTINCTIVE ASPECTS OF SOVIET AND RUSSIAN MILITARY THINKING

Statistics

  Counts

  Total Pages: 9.45
  Total Words: 2363
  Total Characters: 12151
  Number of Sentences: 123


  Averages

  Words per Sentences: 19.21
  Characters per Words: 5.14


  Readability

  Flesch Reading Ease: 56.87
  Fog Scale Level: 12.95
  Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 10.1  

DISTINCTIVE ASPECTS OF SOVIET AND RUSSIAN MILITARY THINKING

HISTORY 421

     This research paper will argue that there are four main areas in which Soviet thinking about war, strategy and defense was, and to a large extent is, distinct from Western thinking.  Firstly, Soviet and Western thinking were governed by different aims.  While the Soviet aim was messianic, the West was content to defend “national interests.”  Secondly, Russian military thinking is more holistic than Western military thinking.  This means that the Russians, unlike many in the West, do not draw sharp lines between different sectors such as the military and civilian components.  Thirdly, Russian thinking is based on systematic use of previous experience to develop a unitary scientific theory of how to prepare for and win wars.  Fourthly and lastly, Soviet military thinking is characterized by certain distinctive cultural attitudes shaped by geography, history, and ideology.
     These four areas of distinctiveness: the Ideological, Holistic, Scientific, and Cultural ways of thinking are not chosen randomly.  The criterion of significance in this research paper is that these highlighted areas are the most important from a Western security perspective.  An understanding of these four areas of distinctiveness was vital to our own survival during the Cold War.  They are still relevant today since much of the mode of thinking remains; though the messianic aims of Communism no longer play a major role.  
     Soviet thinking was based on Marxist-Leninist ideology, and from a Western security point of view the aim of this ideology was important because it meant the advance of Communism and the destruction of Imperialism, especially Capitalism.  This aim is based on a theory of history that sees conflict between material interests of classes as “natural”.  In contrast, Western thinking often assumes that people have harmonious interests.  The role of war in the Marxist theory is to accelerate ...

Please login to view comments from other users.



If you are having problems registering, please don't hesitate to contact us.

© Copyright 1999-2009 Moopuna.com. All Rights Reserved.